Well I'll be damned! I never thought I would see someone review my stories and castigate them for being politically correct ("our PC-adhering author").
While trawling via google for any reviews of my recently published collection,
Their Cramped Dark World and Other Tales I came across this odd review.
I have taken the liberty of copying and pasting it in its entirety below, which can also be read
here.
The BNP’s Red, White, & Blue Rosette of Horror:
Exploring the Dark, Cramped World of Politically Correct Weird Fiction
2,073 words
David A. Riley
Their Cramped Dark World and Other Tales
Parallel Universe Publications, 2015
I’ve frequently hammered at the notion that “weird fiction,” like its
predecessor, Gothic, is an inherently conservative genre, not only in
its themes – the persistence of the past, the reality of hierarchy, the
inescapability of genetics and destiny – but also in its techniques;
in
particular, Lovecraft’s method of creating atmosphere and horror by the
piling up of careful observation, grows off of his scientific and
conservative adherence to facts.[1]
Not everyone likes this, since most “writers” these days are quite
happy to function as unquestioning acolytes of the Leftist ideology of
the day.[2] The book under review here seems to be one of them, so
perhaps a closer look may uncover some interesting memes.
Since I don’t make a habit of frequenting the vast precincts of weird
magazines and websites, confining my attention to a few favorites like
Lovecraft or Ligotti, I knew not David A. Riley, discovering this book
only when he turned up in my habitual Amazon search for “Lovecraft and
free.” His publishers were right to add “Lovecraft” to his descriptors,
as there are certainly a lot of Lovecraft tropes here; tentacles with
sucker mouths turn up frequently, along with decaying villages with
unwholesome, indeed decaying, inhabitants, books that one shouldn’t
read, soapstone carvings leading to loathsome metamorphoses, etc.
The stories themselves are serviceable, making for a pleasant way to
pass the time. Riley even allows himself an occasional sly bit of humor:
Scorn and cynicism, sourness and disdain,
these were Eddie’s usual moods, not some loopy-doopy hippy bliss as if
he’d swallowed a happy pill and won first prize in the National Lottery.
Harold knew then that his friend must have suffered a breakdown.
Mostly, though, we’ve seen all this before, and reading the stories
straight through only emphasizes the familiarity of the plots and
themes.
About halfway through, though, a new theme, at least new to me, began
to emerge. “Swan Song” presents us with the unattractive figure of one
Bennett, a retired (forcibly and early, it would appear) teacher.
Divorced (check; what modern woman would want
him?), living
alone in a shabby flat (check again), he wanders about complaining about
the modern world, where you can’t call a spade a spade thanks to all
this “PC crap.” Like those damned dirty bums (“homeless”? Bah!) over
there.[3] When Bennett discovers they are not merely dirty hippies, but
actually filthy rich dirty hippies, and far form being homeless, live in
a nearby mansion that an oldie like him can appreciate but which they
have selfishly allowed to fall into a Grey Gardens state of decay,
Bennett goes ballistic.
He heads off to the pub, where he knows there’s at least two old
buggers who will allow him to speak his narrow little mind and find his
anti-immigrant sallies to be the
dernier cri in witty political observation: two more fat, blotchy faced losers, drinking beer and spewing not-yet dead white male venom.
As always in such fiction – though almost never in real life – the
boys have been conducting their own secret vigilante society, doling out
violent retribution to whoever for whatever reason violate their
crabbed little norms. The filthy rich hippies will get their
comeuppance, mates.
Anyone who’s read Ramsey Campbell’s “Cold Print”[4] knows what’s
going to happen,[5] but Riley does, I admit, add a new twist. In
Campbell’s story the dirty old man, a gym teacher this time, seeking yet
more sadistic porn, reads the wrong book and meets his Lovecraftian
end. Here, Riley goes
being(sic) (beyond?) using The Olde Conservative as a stock
figure of evil and suggests that such creatures are peculiarly drawn to
monsters,
being so monstrous themselves.
One of the amigos gets his head eaten – Bennett, of course, like all non-Leftists, cares not a whit:
Having little empathy, even for his
friend, was not bothered by what had happened to Pinky. He was just one
less person he could share his time with at the pub. Beyond that he knew
he would barely miss him.
Bennett kills the hippie-monsters and then, in a crowning moment of
scumbaggery, abandons his other friend to the monstrous thing in the
house. In an admittedly nice twist at the end (with the perhaps
unintentionally hilarious line “Bennett, you bastard, open this fucking
door!”) Bennett and Sam become the new scaly-skinned monsters. And here,
Riley delivers his smug little masterstroke:
“We can continue just like before, only
better, stronger” [Sam suggests]. “Those old hippies were hard for them
to work with,” Sam said. “They had to be pushed and threatened, forced
to kill. It went against their principles, you see. The soft old
bastards. Damn near starved these creatures to death . . . It’ll be easer with us. We don’t mind killing, do we? We love it, in fact.” Sam grinned.
Perhaps Cthulhu should give himself a break and hang out at BNP and UKIP meetings.
Maybe he already does.
If you think I’m forcing that identification, well, I’m not. A later
story (the longest, actually a novella), “The Satyr’s Head,” makes it
explicit. It’s the usual “don’t buy a damnably eldritch satyr statue
from a filthy, visibly decaying old bum” story, but when we enter a pub
the really sinister stuff starts:
“You can be a Scottish nationalist or a
Welch nationalist and no one says anything abbot it, but as soon as you
say you’re a British nationalist everyone starts call out ‘Fascist!’”[6]
Yes, it’s the red, white and blue rosette of E-vil: the local BNP candidate.
When the filthy bum turns up dead in an alley, the BNP is quick to try to exploit the mystery:
“I wouldn’t be at all surprised if it
wasn’t something all these Asians have been bringing into the country.
There’s been an increase in TB already, and that was almost unheard do
fa few years ago.”
“Still working hard, I see,” Lamson said, nodding at the red, white and blue National Front rosette on the man’s jacket.
“No rest for the wicked. Someone’s got to
do the devil’s work,” the man joked as the other two smiled in
appreciation of his joke. [I guess the reader is supposed to smile too]
“So far there’s been no mention in the
press, though the local rag – Billy’s Weekly Liar – isn’t acting out of
character there, especially with the elections coming up.”
Of course, the newspapers would never cover up disease or crime among immigrants, now would they? This is England!
Our doomed protagonist is advised to pay him no mind:
“I wouldn’t’ take much notice of Reynolds. The man’s a clown.”
It’s a bit of a tease, though; along the lines of “Swan Song,” I had
expected this theme to develop, with Lawson transforming into the
ultimate monster, a BNP candidate, or some monstrous new party, using
the eponymous head as its symbol. Instead, Lawson’s transformation is “a
thousand times more savage and more terrifying”; like Buffalo Bill, he
turns out to be some kinda repressed homo:
He only wished that his relationship with
Joan, which had been going out with now for three months, wasn’t so
peculiarly Platonic. Whether his was his fault or hers, he did not know.
[He wondered} if the dream wasn’t connect
in some way with his unsatisfactory relations hip with Joan. But the
two things were at such extremes in his mind that he could not connect
hem with anything other than shame.
There was no way in which he could deny
to himself the perverted aspects [the dream] presented to him. But was
he perverted as well?
Yes, friend Lawson is definitely what Maj. “Bat” Guano would call a
“deviated prevert.” The dream, in this case, is the usual precognitive
“you’ll become a monster” dream, but with some decidedly curious
aspects: the satyr is some kind of shemale, with twelve teats and an
erect penis, and keeps jumping
on his back.
How could he possibly make any kind of headway with Joan, he told himself, with such a foul obscenity as that thing troubling him.
In the end, gazing at the statute, it seem to be “gloating at the way
in which it had triumphed over everything else in the flat, including
(or especially) the framed photo of Joan.”
The whole tale seems to be some kind of homosexual allegory; the
filthy tramp that “spots” him as one of them, the head (of the statute)
which he gives Lamson, the signs of his transformation including some
“dark sores around his mouth” like some kind of AIDS related malady,
etc.
Even the title story has a moment where the victim to be muses that
he’s been tricked into staying overnight in a spooky house because his
friend is “secretly queer.”[7]
But how could our PC-adhering author possibly suggest there being
something occult, perverted, ultimately monstrous, about homosexuals?
There might be something more subtle intended here, but the PC crowd is
not big on subtlety, at least when it come to whoever their current pets
are. Mr. Riley would be advised to tread carefully; one wonders if the
BNP bashing is laid on so thick so as to establish his credentials as a
good-thnker?[8]
As I’ve said before, Leftism being a pure abstract notion, ungoverned
by tradition or even “common sense.” It unrolls with unstoppable logic
(as in “the wrong side of history”) from vaguely “sure, why not” ideas
to delirious nuttiness, leaving its most loyal supporters in one
generation, appearing as benighted fools or enemies of the people to the
next.[9] Vigorous union rep and supporter of the New Deal becomes
grouchy bigot Archie Bunker.
As someone said recently, the Right tries to make converts, but the
Left just want victims. Mr. Riley had better watch out; he may wake up
one morning, like K, to find himself on trial; dumped in the waste bin
of history with real monsters, like H. P. Lovecraft.[10]
Notes
[1] As Steve Sailer has pointed out, conservativism is a matter of
noticing things, which PC is designed to prevent. See the essays on Lovecraft published collected in
The Eldritch Evola … & Others (San Francisco: Counter-Currents, 2014), especially the title essay and the review of Graham Harmon’s
Weird Realism.
[2] See my “Reflections on the H. P. Lovecraft Award,”
here.
[3] Their filthy and diseased forms are described lovingly enough to
clue the reader in that these are more than just another pair of dirty
hippies.
[4] In
Tales of the Cthulhu Mythos, ed. August Derleth (Sauk City, Wisconsin: Arkham House, 1969).
[5] In fact, it’s an inversion of a story that really embarrasses
Lovecraft’s modern fans, “The High House in the Mist,” where the 3
burglars are dirty immigrants.
[6] “But when I say that one little old mayor will die, well then everyone loses their minds!” Trevor Lynch, reviewing
The Dark Knight,
notes that “In a ‘free’ society we can’t suppress dangerous truths
altogether. So we have to be immunized against them. That’s why
Hollywood lets dangerous truths appear on screen,
but only in the mouths of monsters: Derek Vinyard in
American History X, Travis Bickle in
Taxi Driver, Bill the Butcher in
Gangs of New York, Ra’s al Ghul in
Batman Begins, the Joker in
The Dark Knight, etc.” —
here and in Trevor Lynch’s
White Nationalist Guide to the Movies (San Francisco: Counter-Currents, 2012).
[7] Dolarhyde: “Do you imply I’m queer?” Loundes (tied up in a chair): “Oh, God no!”—
Manhunter /
Red Dragon. Does “Lamson” suggest
Silence of the Lambs?
[8] There’s also an odd little passage where our satyr-in-transition muses: “There was a smell of fish and chips
and the pungent aroma of curry
as they passed a takeaway, but even this failed to make him feel at
home on the street. He felt foreign and lost, alienated to the things
and places which had previously seemed so familiar to him.” Is the
longing for familiarity a sign of his evil? And, notice the equation of
fish and chips to curry, as signifiers of the Truly British.
[9] Conversely, from the perspective of today, such polar figures as
George Orwell and Eveylyn Waugh can appear as The Same Man (
The Same Man: George Orwell and Evelyn Waugh in Love and War by David Lebedoff (Random House, 2008).
[10] In this respect, it’s interesting to see what Riley, or his publishers, have chosen for a cover illustration: Goya’s
Saturn Devouring his Son.
.png)
